Whether the meeting happened or not, or whether it will happen, is irrelevant. What is happening is that the JW's are being PUBLICALLY scrutinized because of their policies. Since these policies are not in "good conjunction: with current law, that is what is being examined. JR Brown publically said that the JW's don't encourage their members to report child abuse allegations to the police unless they are in a reporting state, but that they don't take it upon themselves to report in states that don't require it. He said that the FAMILIES are not restricted from reporting, but we all know how ambiguous that can be. The question here is whether it is ETHICAL and MORAL to report such things to the authorities.
When a child molestation investigation begins, it is usually with the Elders. The victim's family is obligated to report it to the Elders as soon as it happens. Whether that is reported is consummate upon the Elders. If they don't feel thta there is a reasonable allegation, against the child molester (not two or three witnesses) then it is dropped. If the child reports to other congregation members that this and this and such and such happened, they are labeled as Slanderous and disfellowshipped
I can not understand why elders would do this. Please tell me why...
Country Girl